Home  ·  Site Search  ·  Family Resources  ·  Links  ·  Site Map
Land Grants
Revolutionary War Bounty Land Grants

Revolutionary War Bounty Land Grants

A land bounty is a grant of land from a government as a reward to repay citizens for the risks and hardships they endured in the service of their country, usually in a military related capacity.  It was not only the federal government that gave soldiers bounty land as payment for services, but state governments did also.  At the time of the Revolutionary War, with no stable federal government having been established yet, it was the state government land bounties that were most meaningful to soldiers.  Land grants may also have been provided to your ancestors by Great Britain, if they had served in the British military in America, particularly in the French and Indian War of 1756-1763.  Many British soldiers who had served here, later decided to settle or emigrate, often because land grants were made available after the war, or tour of duty.

By the time of the Revolutionary War, the practice of awarding bounty land as an inducement for enlisting in the military forces had been a long-standing practice in the British Empire in North America. Besides imperial bounty landgrants, both colonial and municipal governments had routinely compensated participants in and victims of military conflicts with land. Land was a commodity in generous supply, and governments seized upon its availability for accomplishing their goals.

In their colonial tradition, the Revolutionary governments patterned their struggle for independence from Great Britain on the principle of bounty lands. They generally offered free lands in exchange for military service, but they strategically did so on the presumption that they would be victorious in their struggle. They would not actually award the lands until the war had been concluded and the British defeated. Such a policy not only imposed no financial constraints on the war effort but also insured a degree of support for the Revolutionary cause. The Revolutionary governments were aware that to the victor belonged the spoils and that defeat brought no reward. Bounty lands were an effective propaganda technique for enrolling support for the war among the citizens and preventing them from lapsing into British supporters when the tide of battle ebbed.

Those colonies with unseated lands used their advantage to enlist support for the cause with the offer of free lands. Unfortunately, some of the Original Thirteen enjoyed no such advantage. There was no bounty land policy in Delaware, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, or Vermont. Those states lacked enough vacant land to support such a policy. Bounty lands were a feature, however, in Connecticut, Georgia, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Virginia. Administratively, these nine states selected reserves in their western domains for the location of bounty lands. Such a choice was seemingly quite logical. By placing veterans on the frontier, the states would be able to rely upon a military force which in turn would be able to protect the settlements from Indian incursions. These state governments also realized that they had to encourage the ex-soldiers to occupy their newly awarded bounty lands, so they granted exemptions from taxation ranging from a few years to life to those veterans who would locate on their respective bounty lands. Such a policy also had the effect of retarding the exodus of a state's population.

Since most of the Indian nations had supported the British during the Revolutionary War, the Thirteen States were cautious in approaching their former enemies. Populating the frontier with citizens skilled in defense offered the best prospect in enticing other settlers to join them. Veterans were knowledgeable in the use of firearms and in military strategy. Knowing that they would be defended if the need arose was reassuring to many settlers. The state governments also realized that the revenue derived from the sale of vacant lands in the west was badly needed. The extension of settlements on the frontier would, in time, also increase the tax rolls and contribute to the reduction of their Revolutionary War debts. In the aftermath of the war, the states with transappalachian claims ceded some of those claims to the federal government, but not until they had the assurance of being able to fulfill their bounty land commitments.

Accordingly, the issue of bounty lands has far wider geographical implications than the area encompassed by the nine state governments which instituted the practice. Besides the original states of Connecticut, Georgia, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Virginia, the future states of Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Ohio, and Tennessee were directly affected by the bounty land system. While the administrative records were, with one exception, the responsibility of the former nine, the bounty land reserves involved the five states West of the Appalachian Mountains.  The states of Georgia, Maryland, New York, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina either had no claims to transappalachian territory or relinquished their claims to the national government.  Accordingly, their reserves for bounty lands lay within their own western borders. In the cases of Georgia and New York, these reserves were to be situated on the definition of their western borders as they existed in 1783. The bounty land reserves in those two states today would be described as being centrally located. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts allotted its bounty lands in the then District of Maine, which in 1820 achieved statehood status.

While most of the states awarded bounty lands for military service, there were two exceptions. Connecticut compensated its citizenry with lands in Ohio if their homes, outbuildings, and businesses were destroyed by the British. Connecticut seemingly awarded no bounty land for military service "per se". Georgia also issued lands to its civilian population who had remained loyal, or at the very least neutral, to the Revolutionary cause after the British restored royal control. There were no Revolutionary War bounty land grants within the current borders of the southern states of North Carolina and Virginia. North Carolina issued its bounty lands in its western lands, which became Tennessee. Virginia selected reserves for its bounty lands in Indiana, Kentucky, and Ohio before ceding its claims to the federal government.

It is important to emphasize that the Continental Congress also made use of the policy of bounty lands. The index to those claims appears in the Index to Revolutionary War Pension Applications in the National Archives (Washington, D.C.: National Genealogical Society, 1976). The federal bounty land records are included in the National Archives micropublication, Revolutionary War Pension and Bounty-Land Warrant Application Files, 1800-1900, Series M804, 2,670 rolls. Abstracts of these files appear in the four-volume work of Virgil D. White, Genealogical Abstracts of Revolutionary War Pension Files (Waynesboro, Tenn.: The National Historical Publishing Company, 1990-1992). The federal government likewise selected a reserve in the Northwest Territory where bounty land warrants could be used to locate land. The U.S. Military Tract in Ohio encompassed portions or all of the counties of Coshochton, Delaware, Franklin, Guernsey, Holmes, Knox, Licking, Marion, Morrow, Muskingum, Noble, and Tuscarawas. These records appear in the micropublications U.S. Revolutionary War Bounty-Land Warrants Used in the Us. Military District of Ohio and Related Papers (Acts of 1788, 1803, 1806), Series M829, 16 rolls, and in Register of Army Land Warrants Issued under the Act of 1788 for Service in the Revolutionary War: Military District of Ohio, Series TlO08, 1 roll.

With the exception of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the other states permitted qualified veterans and/or their dependents to receive bounty lands from both the federal and the respective state governments. Accordingly, there may be relevant bounty land files for soldiers in the Continental Line at both the federal and state levels. While New York made some adjustments, double dipping was the norm in the other states.

Following the American victory at Yorktown in 1781, the various governments sought to implement their bounty land programs. The delay in establishing a governmental agency to fulfill the bounty land pledge holds dual benefits genealogically. Firstly, it increases the likelihood of the survival of a paper trail for proving Revolutionary War participation for many individuals who may not be mentioned in any other record. Secondly, because the benefits were still being processed as late as the l870s in some jurisdictions, there may be a wealth of information pertaining to heirs in bounty land files. Not only do the records locate the veteran in time and place him in a given locality during the Revolutionary War, they also do so for him and/or his dependents in the years following independence when internal migrations within the nation complicate the identification of specific individuals in their various moves.

The appearance of an individual or family in the West after 1783 offers considerable challenge in learning the former domicile or in establishing family relations. A master index to the bounty land grants of the relevant state governments seemed to offer expeditious access to the records holding the potential solution to such a dilemma. While access to the federal records has long since been available in a master index, and while many localities have been treated individually by others works of varying quality, the absence of an overall index has impeded effective use of these significant records.

The above was extracted from the introduction to a master index to state bounty land grants, compiled by Lloyd DeWitt Bockstruck.  For more information, or to purchase his index, follow the link on our Family Resources / Genealogy page to the Genealogical Publishing Company web site.

Pennsylvania Land Grant Allotments

Pennsylvania Land Grant Allotments

As noted above, Pennsylvania had it's own bounty land grant program, in addition to what was available from the federal level.  Pennsylvania's land available for these grants was within the state's own borders, along the western portions of the state.  Pennsylvania alloted land based on the rank of the soldier at the end of the war.  Listed below is the land allotment formula by rank.


RANK ALLOTMENT
Major General 4 - 500 acre tracts
Brigadier General 3 - 500 acre tracts
Colonel 2 - 500 acre tracts
Lieutenant Colonel 1 - 500 acre tract, and 1 - 250 acre tract
Surgeon / Chaplain / Major 2 - 350 acre tracts
Captain 1 - 500 acre tract
Lieutenant 2 - 200 acre tracts
Ensign / Sergeant / Sgt. Major 1 - 250 acre tract
Drummer / Corporal /Private 1 - 200 acre tract

These acres were valued at 80¢ per acre.

                                                                                                                                                                 

Home  ·  Battle of Arkinholm  ·  Battle of Dryfe Sands  ·  Battle of Durham  ·  Battle of Falkirk  ·  Battle of Flodden  ·  Battle of Halidon Hill  ·  Battle of Kirtle  ·  Battle of Lochmaben  ·  Battle of Sark  ·  Battle of Solway Moss  ·  The 15 and the 45  ·  Battle of Hanging Rock - Rev. War  ·  Battle of King's Mountain - Rev. War  ·  Battle of Kittanning - French and Indian War  ·  Caerlaverock Castle  ·  Drumlanrig Castle  ·  Lochmaben Castle  ·  Morton Castle  ·  Threave Castle  ·  Coat of Arms  ·  DNA of the Family  ·  Family History Research Centre  ·  Family Resources  ·  Butterwhat  ·  Denbie  ·  Dormont  ·  Fourteenacre  ·  Holmains  ·  Mouswald  ·  Rammerscales  ·  Genealogy Studies of Carothers and Carruthers  ·  Genealogy Terminology  ·  Missouri  ·  North Carolina  ·  Oregon  ·  Pennsylvania  ·  Tennessee  ·  Washington  ·  Land Grants  ·  Library and Reviews  ·  Name Originations  ·  Name Translations to English  ·  Scotland's Namesake  ·  Scotland Travel  ·  Douglas Heron Bank  ·  Kings Of and In Scotland  ·  Scottish Parliament Vote For and Against Union with England  ·  Wardens of the Border  ·  Spelling Changes  ·  Cornwallis Defied by Eleanor Carruthers Wilson  ·  Jesse James Close Encounter  ·  Murder In Pennsylvania  ·  Little Dalton Kirk  ·  Sir Walter Scott Novel  ·  Suicide of the Mouswald Heiress  ·  Surnames Related by Marriage and or History  ·  Constitution Convention Attendees  ·  Declaration of Independence Signers  ·  Spanish Flu - 1918  ·  Testimonials
Copyright © 2007, 2008 Carothers Enterprises O Fallon, IL
webmaster@carothers-carruthers.com

This site was grabbed using the TRIAL version of Grab-a-Site. This message does not appear on a licensed copy of Grab-a-Site.